Double consent
Rule that a commercial relationship between two actors is publishable only if BOTH consent. The sender’s consent alone is not enough: making « X supplies Y » public reveals as much about Y as about X, and Y signed nothing.
What the blog says
- Who Owns the Proof?
Elinor Ostrom (Nobel 2009), the governance of the commons, and the question that killed the agricultural-data platforms: proof whose value lies in its mass can only belong to those who create it.
- Why the Orchard Never Gets Planted
Oliver Williamson: asset specificity, the fundamental transformation, the hold-up. The real cost of opacity is not in the disputes — it is in the orchards that are missing.
- Two Honest People Who Fail to Close
A canteen, a market gardener, a deal that was there to be had — and no deal. A 1983 theorem states what no amount of traceability will ever fix.
- The Gaze You Can’t Return
“It’s surveillance.” With Foucault and the panopticon: the three properties of a surveillance device — which ones a registry can reverse, and which it never can.
Where it is implemented
lib/grossiste-data-agreement/types.ts