Transparency score

Score from 0 to 100 measuring what a producer DISCLOSES, not how good they are: profile completeness 20 %, lots signed over twelve months 30 %, valid certifications 30 %, recency of activity 20 %. An impeccable but silent producer scores low — by design, since the measure is about disclosure.

Not to be confused with

  • Trust Index

    Score from 0 to 100 qualifying an ACTOR, aggregated from its verifiable proofs: anchored attestations 30 %, certifications 27 %, HACCP audits 18 %, carbon transparency 15 %, B2B endorsements 10 %. Recomputed on demand — freshness is what makes it credible. Tiers: platinum ≥ 85, gold ≥ 70, silver ≥ 50, bronze ≥ 25, otherwise unrated.

  • Proof score (discovery)

    RANKING score computed from the already-loaded fields of a listing, so a result list can be ordered without one store read per entity. It shares the tier scale of the other scores but not their inputs: for the same listing it may differ from the transparency score. The list badge is therefore labelled « proof », never « transparency ».

  • Trust capital

    Per-owner aggregate of the signed attestations they have accumulated: a volume, not a grade. Where the Trust Index weights and normalises to a hundred, trust capital counts what has been produced and surfaces it inside its owner’s workspace.

What the blog says

  • The Market for Lemons: What Akerlof Tells Us About Traceability

    George Akerlof’s (Nobel laureate 1970) “market for lemons” theory explains why, absent proof, a product’s invisible quality ends up priced at the market average — and how traceability answers that.

  • Why Opacity Pays

    Ronald Coase (Nobel 1991), transaction costs, and what happens to food supply chains when verification stops costing anything: the opacity rent, and its foretold end.

  • Who Sorts, When No One Proves Anything?

    Joseph Stiglitz (Nobel 2001), screening, and why food sovereignty begins with verification: when the seller doesn’t signal, it’s the buyer who organizes the sorting.

  • Nobody Is Cheating — And That’s Exactly the Problem

    John Nash, the prisoner’s dilemma and the stag hunt: why an entire food chain coordinates on price without a single one of its players behaving badly.

  • Du Normalbaum au label : pouvoir déplier la simplification

    Un label rend une réalité complexe lisible, et c’est une fonction essentielle. Reste à pouvoir remonter derrière la catégorie — sans la supprimer ni la discréditer.

  • La moelle inventée

    Mirapolis avait dressé un Gargantua de 33 mètres. Rabelais avait prévenu : le risque n’est pas seulement de rester à la surface, c’est d’inventer le fond.

  • Opacity Is Not a Lie

    What a seventeenth-century philosopher has to do with traceability: why the opacity of an origin is not fraud but mutilated knowledge, to be restored rather than punished.

Where it is implemented

Canonical identifier: https://veratrace.xyz/ontology#ScoreTransparence